2018-2019 Proposition 10: Tax Redistribution/Salary Floor

[WigNosy]

From: viewtopic.php?f=37&t=5906

It has been proposed that we do some sort of redistribution of luxury tax payments and at the same time implement a salary floor that must be reached to receive these payments.

This proposition will use the most conservative version of the proposed redistribution, to wit:

1. In order to be eligible for a redistribution payment, the following must be true:
1a. The final taxable team salary must have been under the luxury tax apron
AND one of the following must be true:
1b. The team's final taxable salary must have been at least 90% of the salary cap (the "Salary Floor")
OR
1c. The team must be delinquent on past taxes (because teams delinquent on past taxes are unable to offer more than veteran minimum contracts, they may have a hard time getting their salary up to 90% of the cap)

2. One-half of the amount collected in luxury tax (rounded down) will be split among eligible non-taxpaying teams (points per team rounded down again after division by number of eligible teams).

3. A team may receive no more than 10 points per season in luxury tax redistribution payments.

[TheSyndicate]

voted

[Darth Vegito]

Voted

[NOLa.]

Voted

[JNR]

Voted

[Wombataholic]

voted

[kucoach7]

v

[garbageman]

Voted

[IamQuailman]

voted

[digiskunk]

Voted!

[RPF]

voted

[Inner_GI]

voted

[ballsohard]

Voted no, and i have no clue why these are coupled since i'm highly for a floor but completely against redistribution.

[false9]

Voted

[NickMalone77]

Voted.

[MESSI_2.0]

Voted

[Conroy]

voted

[LoCo89]

Voted

[PaulyP]

voted

[WigNosy]

Raby contacted me prior to the close of the poll and mentioned he accidentally voted "Yes" but meant to vote "No." Given that and the fact that multiple people contacted me and said they wanted a floor but not a tax redistribution (with the suggestion that failing to meet the salary floor should mean a forfeit of TC insurance) I will cast the deciding vote against this proposition. We will have one more proposition in the final round of propositions with that adjusted tie of the free TC insurance to the salary floor instead.

[Darth Vegito]

Raby contacted me prior to the close of the poll and mentioned he accidentally voted "Yes" but meant to vote "No."

Traitor

[78#]

I would have voted no, but the poll ended.

[Darth Vegito]

I would have voted no, but the poll ended.

You had a almost a week. Do we need to find Houston stewards too?

I volunteer!

Sent from my VS988 using Tapatalk