Mike Lowry wrote: Thu Jun 11, 2026 11:15 am
May blow your mind that I'm asking this question this early, but the standings seem to be close to locked in for the season.
How many teams do you expect to move from their current spot?
Who will rise?
Who will fall?
What do you think about the tiers of competition that we're looking at this season?
As I tend to do in my own head until the last couple of sims of the season, I'm going to focus on "Point Differential" rather than "Win Totals" and I'm also going to ask, "are there any structural changes that the Point Differential can't capture?"
So I'm going to start with the Tiers of competition.
Tier 1: Title Favorites: Spurs, Celtics - For all the talk about the Spurs, the Celtics have quietly built a big bad juggernaut in the East to oppose them. Barring injury, this is your Finals matchup.
Tier 2: Contenders: Bucks, Nets, Timberwolves, Trailblazers, Supersonics - I put the Bucks here despite their double-digit point differential because (1) there is a bigger bap between the Bucks and Celtics than the Bucks and Nets and (2) the Bucks have undergone a structural change that Point Differential doesn't capture by swapping out 40% of their starting lineup at the deadline. Only 7 games, with 6 at home, isn't a large enough sample size for me to evaluate whether they stepped up a tier yet.
Tier 3: Solid but not Contenders: Bulls, Pistons, Rockets, Suns, Kings - The Kings might have been in the "Structural Changes" group but another injury to McHale means we're going to see about what we've seen most of this season (when McHale was also hurt). It sucks, but that's where we are this year, and they're in significant danger of missing the playoffs when a healthy McHale might lead to some upsets.
Tier 4: A move away from the playoffs: Cavs, Nuggets, Pacers, Lakers - The Pacers are in "Structural Changes" for me so they could rise or fall, it's too early to tell after the Kersey trade.
Tier 5: Should be tanking - Mavs, Hornets, Hawks - I think all three of these teams have the talent to quickly pivot in the offseason but we have 2/3 of a season's worth of results and the current mix of players clearly hasn't worked.
Tier 6: Tanking - Jazz, 76ers, Bullets, Knicks, Warriors. At least three teams on this list are not only bad, but actively want to be bad. They're not inclined to turn it around this year and maybe not next year either.
Who could rise above their current state? The Kings - but only as a playoff spoiler if they can hang on, make the playoffs, and get McHale back.
Teams that could rise or fall: Bucks, Pacers - I need to see how the chemistry shakes out post-Kersey trade. I can see things going either way for both teams.
What do I think about the tiers of competition? Every league has to have Tiers 2, 3, 4, and 5 - you will have good teams, slightly above average teams, slightly below average teams, and bad teams. I think the problematic Tiers are the outliers - 1 and 6... it's not good for the league to have the title be more or less a foregone conclusion all season and it's not healthy that teams have to actively try to be bad in order to get good draft position - you should be able to have a "natural" bad year where you thought you could be good (or have a season marred by injury) and get a top player rather than actively work at being bad, IMO... because it's teams actively trying to be bad that build the super-teams by selling off parts for pennies on the dollar. Sell-offs exaggerate the gaps between the "haves" and the "have nots" and reinforce the class system rather than making it possible to move up a couple of tiers with a deft off-season.