Back to Basics: Indianapolis Pacers

Articles, Scouting Reports, Power Polls, oh my! Media Relations is fueled by GM contributions
Post Reply
User avatar
IamQuailman
Posts: 10407
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2015 8:25 am
PBSL Team: Milwaukee Bucks
Contact:

Back to Basics: Indianapolis Pacers

Post by IamQuailman »

Every league season, the “smart marks” of the People’s Basketball Sim League make their predictions on a plethora of outcomes, including division champs and league winners. And every league season, there is one team that always flies under the radar and shocks the world. Last season, we had the joy of watching the magical return to glory for Orlando’s franchise. Desean Hawkins thrusted himself into the conversation as a top scoring wing in the league, General Manager False “I May Be Wong But I Doubt It” Nine catapulted himself to a coveted General Manager of the Year title, and somehow they managed to get a top 3 pick in a loaded draft to further tool the team for years to come. But that was last year. There’s a new team we need to shift our focus to… and that team is none other than the Indianapolis Pacers.

General Manager Pauly P has been around since the dawn of sim league time, pre-dating our very own People’s Basketball Sim League (shout out and RIP to the wild west that was Hornets Report Sim League). In the 34 seasons (including this one for the sake of win counts) that this league has been around for, Pauly has made the playoffs 18 times, won a division title 3 times, won a conference title once, and posts a career (at the time of writing this) 50.9% win percentage. Needless to say, Pauly knows what it takes to be a successful regular season GM and how to build a team that can advance to the playoffs. However, in the past seasons, the Pacers struggled to find the success that they would typically find in their team building, having missed the post-season 5 out of the last 6 seasons.

This season, the Pacers may have re-discovered the recipe for their success. They have risen from the ashes of the bottom of the Central (although not the basement like the Cavs have been calling home for god-knows-how-long). As of the end of December, the Pacers were ranked #10 in the Strength of Schedule Power Rankings (viewtopic.php?f=7&t=7120). New rankings are being released soon, but an insider has informed me that after a strong start to 2024 the Pacers may have actually risen even higher than their end-of-December ranking! Be sure to check the Power Ranking Thread for updates later today!

Back to the team’s make-up, it was all about getting back to the basics. And by basics, I mean he reached back into his cook book and pull out a recipe from the 1990s era. Back in the mid-1990s, the Pacers were a mainstay in the top 3 of the Central Division. Three common denominators that Pauly’s teams always had were: defensive-minded guards, athletic wings, and dominant big man tandems.

During that era of Pacers success, we saw the rise of one of the best young, defense-first point guards from the 90s in the Dee Brown. The defensive mind-set of Dee Brown running point set the tone for the team, similar to the current roster and Marcus Smart.
Image
Image
Obviously, there are some differences. Dee had a better jump shot and was a bit quicker; Marcus is a few inches taller. But overall, their make-up as a player is quite similar. And for this success Pacers recipe, it starts here.

Now, those who were around back then may slap me for talking about Dee Brown first, but trust me, I didn’t forget the Pacers superstar: Stacey Augmon.
Image
Stacey Augmon was drafted #7 in his draft class and was clearly the 2nd best player in that draft class (behind Steve Smith). With his athleticism and skill set, Stacey could create for himself and attack the rim on offense; on defense, good luck scoring on him. He was quite possibly the premiere 2-way wing of the 1990s. Looking at the Pacers now, there is no one player that compares to Stacey. It’s hard to strike gold twice. That said, the Pacers have created an amalgamation of players that, if they were to do a fusion dance, could transform into a close enough representation of Stacey Augmon’s game as you can get.
Image
In other words, the complimentary parts of Jabari Parker, Truman Wrenn, and Zach Lavine bring all the athleticism, scoring, defense (although to a lesser degree) and rebounding that Augmon brought (albeit split across multiple players). Some may argue that maybe it’s better to have 3 parts than 1 whole, as it provides depth in the event of injury. And depth is definitely something the modern day Pacers have in abundance.

The 3rd and final ingredient of 1990s Pacers success was the presence of a dominant big man tandems. In the early 90s, this was Patrick Ewing and A.C. Green (one of the original yellow/yellows that outplayed his color rating). This tandem frequented the League Leader Top-25 rebounder list for the seasons they played together, and the Pacers as a team were always Top 10 in the league in the rebounding category. Green scored when needed (and efficiently), while Ewing was the go-to post presence. In the mid-90s, this duo was replaced eventually with the combo of Rony Seikaly and Derek Strong. Fast forward to the modern-day squad… and what do we have? A new dominant duo in Judd Williams and Charles Kuntz leading the way in the paint. They are the two leading scorers on this roster and lead the way in terms of rebounding as well. Judd, while undersized, is proving to the league and its fans that he is well-worth the contract he received in the RFA.

With this combination of skill-sets (not only in the starting line-up but also off the bench), the Pacers have come out firing. Through mid-January, they sit at 3rd in the Central, only 4 games back of the division-leading Milwaukee Bucks. There is plenty of season time left, and things can change. But the under-dog Indianapolis Pacers are proving that maybe they aren’t the underdogs after all. Perhaps, they are becoming the team to beat in the Central. All it took was turning back the clock and doing what they always did best.
ImageImageImageImage
N
NOLa.
Posts: 3994
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2015 9:21 pm
PBSL Team: Sacramento Kings

Re: Back to Basics: Indianapolis Pacers

Post by NOLa. »

Nice article, definitely like the comparison to the 90s Pacers Pauly put together. I felt when he added Lavine it really would help as Smart is not a facilitator like traditional PGs, and it’s really paying off this season so far.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
IamQuailman
Posts: 10407
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2015 8:25 am
PBSL Team: Milwaukee Bucks
Contact:

Re: Back to Basics: Indianapolis Pacers

Post by IamQuailman »

NOLa. wrote:Nice article, definitely like the comparison to the 90s Pacers Pauly put together. I felt when he added Lavine it really would help as Smart is not a facilitator like traditional PGs, and it’s really paying off this season so far.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thanks, Tani. It was fun going back and looking over the old indexes!

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

ImageImageImageImage
User avatar
kucoach7
Posts: 1906
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2015 11:05 pm
PBSL Team:

Re: Back to Basics: Indianapolis Pacers

Post by kucoach7 »

Enjoyed this.
User avatar
IamQuailman
Posts: 10407
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2015 8:25 am
PBSL Team: Milwaukee Bucks
Contact:

Re: Back to Basics: Indianapolis Pacers

Post by IamQuailman »

kucoach7 wrote:Enjoyed this.
Thanks man!

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

ImageImageImageImage
User avatar
78#
Posts: 2996
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2015 9:23 pm
PBSL Team:

Re: Back to Basics: Indianapolis Pacers

Post by 78# »

This seems like you’re trying to get points from an article that reads more like a nomination for GM of the Year.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Image Image
User avatar
IamQuailman
Posts: 10407
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2015 8:25 am
PBSL Team: Milwaukee Bucks
Contact:

Re: Back to Basics: Indianapolis Pacers

Post by IamQuailman »

78# wrote:This seems like you’re trying to get points from an article that reads more like a nomination for GM of the Year.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This isn't an article about the New York Knicks, so def not GMOY nomination

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

ImageImageImageImage
User avatar
PaulyP
Posts: 1951
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 1:50 am
PBSL Team: Indiana Pacers

Re: Back to Basics: Indianapolis Pacers

Post by PaulyP »

Article of the Year winner
Pacers Ring of Honor
P.Ewing (90-93, 98) - R.Pierce (90-91) - S.Augmon (91-96) - D.Brown (93-96) - D.Strong (91-97, 99-02) - P.Pierce (98-05, 12-13) - D.Williams (05-17) - I.Shumpert (11-16) - D.Dedmon (13-18) - J.Williams (19-25, 31-32)
User avatar
IamQuailman
Posts: 10407
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2015 8:25 am
PBSL Team: Milwaukee Bucks
Contact:

Re: Back to Basics: Indianapolis Pacers

Post by IamQuailman »

PaulyP wrote:Article of the Year winner
Image

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

ImageImageImageImage
User avatar
78#
Posts: 2996
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2015 9:23 pm
PBSL Team:

Re: Back to Basics: Indianapolis Pacers

Post by 78# »

IamQuailman wrote:
78# wrote:This seems like you’re trying to get points from an article that reads more like a nomination for GM of the Year.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This isn't an article about the New York Knicks, so def not GMOY nomination

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
You <expletive deleted>


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Image Image
User avatar
drkavarga
Posts: 2026
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2018 10:33 pm
PBSL Team: Bobcats

Re: Back to Basics: Indianapolis Pacers

Post by drkavarga »

IamQuailman wrote: Sun Oct 14, 2018 1:47 pm
78# wrote:This seems like you’re trying to get points from an article that reads more like a nomination for GM of the Year.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This isn't an article about the New York Knicks, so def not GMOY nomination

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Exactly 😎👍
General Manager of the Charlotte Bobcats
D
Darth Vegito
Posts: 2465
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 5:20 pm
PBSL Team: New Orleans Pelicans

Re: Back to Basics: Indianapolis Pacers

Post by Darth Vegito »

Point Czar awards you 6(5+1 for DBZ gif) points! 1021 words
Post Reply

Return to “In/Off-Season Media”