2022-2023 Self-Nomination: Media Point Distributor

[NickMalone77]

Job description is below.

Media Point Distributor (2021 Season = Ballsohard):
- Compensation: 5PTS
- Award points for media sessions (based on standing criteria for point awarding)
- Award points timely (prior to pre-regular season training, prior to all-star break training, prior to end of the season)

To self-nominate for this position for the 2022 season, please post in this thread before the deadline of UFA Round 1 bids (TBA by 5:00pm Central).

[ballsohard]

In,

The changes i plan on making :

Remove the team oriented versus league orientation. There’s no reason why a well thought out team centric article should be limited to 3 points. There’s some pretty “phone it in articles” that get 5 bc they’re league centric and some time put in team centric that can only get 3.

After doing it a few years I’d say the following modifications are needed:
- remove 3 point cap on team centric articles
-remove the auto 5 points for posting an article
- remove 5 point cap and place it to 10 points that you can receive on an article.


This way someone can do like tani used to do and update a team website all year and get 10 points.. then do a well thought out article like Todd did and get 10 and fill in the gaps from there.

5 submissions are a lot to get to the cap and frankly relying on volume to get to the cap rewards and rewards low qualities articles imo.

[garbageman]

In,

The changes i plan on making :

Remove the team oriented versus league orientation. There’s no reason why a well thought out team centric article should be limited to 3 points. There’s some pretty “phone it in articles” that get 5 bc they’re league centric and some time put in team centric that can only get 3.

After doing it a few years I’d say the following modifications are needed:
- remove 3 point cap on team centric articles
-remove the auto 5 points for posting an article
- remove 5 point cap and place it to 10 points that you can receive on an article.


This way someone can do like tani used to do and update a team website all year and get 10 points.. then do a well thought out article like Todd did and get 10 and fill in the gaps from there.

5 submissions are a lot to get to the cap and frankly relying on volume to get to the cap rewards and rewards low qualities articles imo.

What would objectively qualify an article to get 10 points vs. 5 points or any other amount of points in a way that won't invite a lot of argument between poster and point czar?

[digiskunk]

i'll throw my hat in the bin again, why not!

[NickMalone77]

Last chance to volunteer till 5pm today.