The recent look at the tax bills plus my own inability to score reasonable deals (to me) in free agency has led me to reflect on contracts league-wide.
In this piece, I'm going to look at some criteria for a class contracts that may be negative assets . . . so whatever their value is, it will decline and a team can not unilaterally rid itself of that contract. This is just one look at one set of contracts. I'm sure there are other ways to approach this problem.
We can define a bad contract as "one that isn't worth it," but that's not very helpful. It's too difficult to extract "worth" and "it" here. Additionally, let it be known that I'm not condemning the decisions to hand out certain contracts. Sometimes, you do the bad deal to get what you want, put you over the top, or simply because it is the best option among the available choices. I'm judging none of that. At the end of this, I'd like to hear some objective commentary from some owners of the contracts on this list, of course, to hear their thoughts on what they like about these contracts.
As such, I'm going to ask a related question to pare down the contracts, reserving the right to add further criteria: "What contracts are 1) above average salary 2) for more than one guaranteed year 3) that increases in salary 4) for a player the is at least 31, so declining in overall ability?" According to the Training Camp analysis, a 31 year old declines in training camp, I use that as a line in the sand. The same goes for average salary . . . I can change the criterion, but let's start somewhere, and average seems a good a place as any. The other criteria are self-evident.
Going back to context one last time, this is loosely asking: Which contracts take up more than average space and are guaranteed to worsen in value in more than one way . . . both in contract size and in player value? This is fair question to ask, but a contract with this property is not necessarily a bad contract. It is, however, a negative asset.
The total cap figure for the League is $1,650,875,613 (awwwww shit). If we go per team, that's $56,926,745.28, which is over the cap by a good bit, and is just the way the Players' Union wants it. On a per player basis, which is what we care about, the average salary is $4,884,247.38. For reference, the median salary is $2,067,807. This is expected due to salary floors and the strong modality in contracts. More on that later.
Of the 338 contracts we are left with after the trade deadline purge, 109 have values above the average, the smallest of which is $4,901,000. These 109 contracts, or just under 1/3 of the contracts of the League, represent in $1,282,055,039, or almost 78% of the salary cap. That's just in current year salary, to be clear.
Of these 109 contracts, 77 have multiple years on them and 7 of those have team options (some may have already been cleared). The Timberwolves have already said they are picking up Shaq's option, and that's fine, but I left him off the list. Again, this is not about choices, but about contracts. His salary was under control of the team, so it could have been zero if a team decided that way. Also, I left in player options here because I'm assuming that players will pick up a large salary. If I'm proven wrong here or there, so be it; I think the message will remain the same.
Filtering for age (taking into account birthdays between now and camp) and contracts that do no increase in value, I found 20 contracts. I'll double check my list as best I can, but I'm sure you guys will, too. This list, about 1/17 of the contracts of the League, however, is worth $280,488,656, or about 1/6 of the aggregate League cap figure. In percentages, that means 6% on the League's contracts classify as negative assets by this definition while occupying almost 17% of the League's cap figure.
I have to do some work (the spaceship kind), so this will continue soon. I will present the 20 contracts (they are not hard to find), dig in a little, and pass on a few observations I made during this investigation.
To be clear, the next post should just be considered this same article and not for additional points.