Mike Lowry wrote: Sun Nov 30, 2025 1:05 am
Who's Movin? - What trades do you see coming at day 60?
Natt's time in Chicago is coming to a close. It might not be an easy contract to move, as it's an old max, but I don't think it's impossible. In a highly competitive East, the Bulls look to be one of the teams clearly on the outs, so it's probably time to cut the cord. Of the trio of Cheeks, Natt, and Short, Natt is by far the easiest one to move.
Short's an UFA, so even though matching salary is much easier with him, GMs are understandably going to be wary of moving too much for what could be a rental. I do think that the Knicks are desperate enough to round out their lineup that they might make a play for him. Cheeks is very close to being a complete non-starter. He's b/b and still a top-notch PG, but being on tap for two more near-max money seasons after this one is risky business. 30 seemingly isn't quite the instant death that it used to be though, so there's a good chance that Cheeks will still be a legitimate backup at least in the final year of his contract. Will that help grease the wheels? I dunno.
Natt's the perfect blend of affordability, contract length, and production. He's only in the hook for one season after this one, and it's only 1.2 mil. Keep an eye out for the Pistons, as Michael Ray Richardson's expiring both matches salary and gives LogP 1.2 mil less to worry about next season. Natt can either start at SG to form a huge starting 5 or Tbone, or come off the bench to back up Alvin and Terry.
Mike Lowry wrote: Sun Nov 30, 2025 1:05 amWho's Groovin? - Which teams will improve with cohesion?
Same answer as last week, the Trailblazers. They already got back over .500 during the last sim, and even though they still don't look great, I do feel like they'll be able to threaten the lower seeds in the West. Worthy being out for almost two months is a big loss, but anyone who thinks that English is too old to step in and fill that void isn't thinking straight. If Wig is giving this team his full focus, they will get better.
Mike Lowry wrote: Sun Nov 30, 2025 1:05 amWho's Holiday Plans Are Ruined? - Which teams should turn for the tank sooner than later?
Every Western conference team under .500 should take a look at their roster and contracts and determine if they really want to keep going with the guys they have. I really don't think it's wise to rely on the cap continually rising to bail you out if you're currently bumping up against the tax. Not paying attention to who's on your roster and how much they cost could see you unexpectedly giving away a player you don't want to in order to clear space for a player that you really want to keep. A lot of Western Conference teams have started off bad enough, and have enough younger talent to make the pivot now and start a rebuild. I don't know which one of them will lighten the load and tank away, but they all should consider it.