Mike Lowry wrote: Sun Jun 29, 2025 3:18 pm
What's more interesting right now, the race for the bottom, or the race for the top?
How did people get caught in the middle?
Who are you surprised to see in the position they're in?
Definitely the race for the top, especially in the West. In the West, a team's playoff position could mean the difference between a WCF appearance and a 1st-round exit. It's a little less cutthroat in the East, though I'm sure nobody wants to finish 6th and have to face the Bulls in Round 1 instead of having a small shot at drafting one of the Big 4.
The teams in the middle ended up there primarily because of not really committing to any direction. Most of the teams that are in contention for Jordan/Olajuwon/Stockton/Barkley are either legitimately bad, or made calculated efforts to be bad. Most of the teams that aren't in that group are littered with failed or poorly-thought-out pieces to either facilitate a tank or compete. I think a lot of middling teams held on to good players that they liked thinking that it wouldn't impact their losing too much, which let teams that were more willing to clean house jump ahead of them. Likewise, teams that either didn't have the willingness or trade capital to load up got blown out of the water by teams who were able to (or who already had an incumbent advantage).
As for one team I'm surprised to see where they're at...I just don't understand why the Rockets decided to go in the direction they did. Re-signing Gilmore at that price is just horrible, and Birdsong - while a good player - probably isn't that much better of a contract in the grand scheme of things. If Bird being traded truly wasn't an option, then why weren't legitimate moves made to build some semblance of a competitive roster? Instead, you have a Bottom 4 roster that Bird is keeping firmly in the #6-9 range.