Mike Lowry wrote: Thu Jan 02, 2025 12:20 am
Why is the trade market locked?
I think it's not any single thing but a combination of factors, in approximately this order...
1. Bunching of teams means very few teams have incentive to sell. Only two teams are really "out of" the playoff chase (Atlanta and Philadelphia) and they are both heavy on "players with room to improve in the future" - nobody else is that interested in selling since they still feel they can make a jump up if they "buy."
2. The draft class is high-quality. There are 14 blue-potential players in the draft class and another 10 green-potential players. Since most teams have only four or so green+ potential players, it's very difficult to convince teams that it's a good idea to move a first-round pick. Since picks tend to be the biggest trade currency, it makes the market tight.
Factor 1 means there's very few sellers. Factor 2 means there are very few buyers. No sellers plus no buyers make for no trade market. But I think there's a third factor involved as well...
3. Every rotation player is still an owner's "most recent draft pick" - it's human nature to be invested in your choices and be loathe to admit you picked "wrong" right away. People are attached to the guys they've drafted and want to think they made good choices.
Who do you think will land a trade before the deadline?
I really don't know. I think we might see some shuffling of bench pieces, and I think odds are at least one team toward the bottom of the "playoff bunching" gets an offer they can't refuse and decides to take a deal and let go of their (slim) playoff hopes... think of New York/Washington in the East or San Diego/Seattle in the West (the Lakers made the Cartwright/Donaldson trade and since they can't trade Donaldson for 60 days, I don't see them making another big move before the deadline unless someone loves World B. Free).
Will any team acquire a piece that will take them over the top?
No, but mostly because I think Indiana is still on the inside track to win it and (1) nobody is going to trade them the piece credited with "taking them over the top" and (2) nobody else is willing to spend the capital it's going to take to acquire a difference-maker big enough to beat them ("take them over the top"). One or two teams might try, I just don't think it's going to get them over the top.
EDIT: Wrote this before reading the Sonics/Bucks trade. I guess Seattle in the West did decide they were going to drop out, and I have to admit, I think the Bucks' acquisition of Parish might just be enough to get them over the Pacers, but I'm still going to have to see it to believe it. On the other hand, I think now if the Pacers swing a trade to get a big man to match the Laimbeer/Parish combo in Milwaukee, they might be credited with that trade "taking them over the top." So maybe I'm already getting proven wrong...