Gimme the championship. Because even if they weren't made that particular season, almost guaranteed that you had to take big swings prior to winning that championship. I know I'd certainly like to not be stuck at 1 forever. Trades, which you know I like to pull off, are great fun but the luster wears off real fast if they don't pan out like you hoped. A terrible lesson I learned last season.garbageman wrote:Sham Smith, Bulls.com: Just a general question on team philosophy. Would you rather have a season where you win the championship without making a single trade or a season where you don't win the championship, but you pull off three trades that you are excited about? And, of course, why?
There are two things that come to mind, and both could be pulled off in one move if everything aligned perfectly.K-100 wrote:As you start to build around Sterner/McAlister where do you think you need to focus next to make the Clippers contenders again?
First note is : I'm not interested in moving them and McAlister can't be moved yet. Those things out of the way, it actually ties into my answer to K100's question. If I were to be swayed to move these guys now, it would have to be as part of a package that brought in a game changer that can single-handedly lift everyone else up and make you a force to worry about. Considering I have a bunch of cap flexibility now and in the coming seasons plus Sterner and McAlister are on reasonable contracts, wouldn't make much sense to move them for younger parts that I'd just be hoping got to the level they're at now.greepleairport wrote:I like this question more: what would it take to sell sterner or McAllister? You say you’re always listening...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
To the first and third questions, I'm confident the answer is NO. If the Bulls don't win the division, injuries must have ravaged them because they're stronger and deeper than anyone else in the division. While I respect and love my guys, Terry and Marcel in particular, they are a missing piece or 3 away. Which leads into the trade question. Looking at my assets currently, I'm guessing it's not enough to take a huge swing like I often like to do. It certainly depends on the way the other team in any potential deal values assets, but thats just my thought.NOLa. wrote:Is this team good enough to beat the Bulls for the division? What are the goals this season? Is there a big move to be made that would help get the Clippers back into the conversation as a championship competitor?
I'm honestly not 100% positive ill ever be ready for a long rebuild. These seasons take too much time off my life to commit to that. If it happen organically, so be it but I feel like I'll always have an eye on a win-now move if they present themselves.AngryBanana wrote:Chet Youbetcha, Dimmadome News: With so many GMs, including yourself, opting for quick builds over a long build, do you see yourself attempting to go with a longer plan this time around since McCalister is only 23?
No, because McAlister is now a win-now piece. That said, if its a win much more now piece, preferably one who isn't a geezer, I'd certainly look at it.Xist2Inspire wrote:Random Reporter: While it's plain to see that you've been intending to build around Sterner for a while now, he's currently 26. So as a follow-up to your answer to the previous question, do you see yourself maybe having to move McAlister for a win-now piece in order to get the most out of Sterner's prime?