Revising Athletics Ratings

Have an idea for the league? Want to see a new rule put in or an old one abolished? Start a discussion here during the off-season or during the regular season!
Post Reply
User avatar
ballsohard
Posts: 3816
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2015 10:11 pm
PBSL Team: Philidelphia 76ers

Revising Athletics Ratings

Post by ballsohard »

For quite some time Athletic ratings have been one of the biggest sets of ratings boosted by GMs. And why wouldn’t they be? They’re innate, meaning they effect every play on every minute they’re in. Frankly rating for rating they’re the most potent increases you can make for a player, both for the present and the future.

With the introduction of the college sim, we’ve seen a lot of guys with intriguing skill sets out but sometimes leaving a lot to be desired in the athleticism department for their position. From 40 quickness pgs , 35 str centers to everyone having terrible Stamina.

I think the college sim has brought a lot of fun to the league but it calls for some changes that we need to make.

I would like to bring up a discussion on changing athletic ratings.

I had two ideas:

1. Keep current cost system, but ratings will have certain dividers percentage multipliers for their college position

The thought behind this is we say as an example (not fleshed out at all):

PGs
.75 QKN
1.25 STR
1. JMP

SG
.85 QKN
1.15 STR
1 JMP

SF
1.15 QKN
1 STR
.9 JMP

ETC


2. Keep current cost system, but ratings will have certain dividers (opposite of multipliers) for size. (I like the first one better)


Same as above...



The other idea was for STA

Players in our league with 30-40 sta are pretty dumn to have.

I think we should have a way top get their STA increase to 75.
Maybe we increase this in tiers
<50 10 points to increase to 75
>=50 8 points to increase to 75


Please comment on this and let me know what you think or if you have any other ideas. Thanks


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
ImageImage
Image
N
NOLa.
Posts: 3994
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2015 9:21 pm
PBSL Team: Sacramento Kings

Re: Revising Athletics Ratings

Post by NOLa. »

For clarification, option two for size would be something along the lines of

5'11 and under
.75 qkn
1.25 str
1.0 jmp

6'0-6'2
etc
User avatar
IamQuailman
Posts: 10407
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2015 8:25 am
PBSL Team: Milwaukee Bucks
Contact:

Re: Revising Athletics Ratings

Post by IamQuailman »

Can we bump this?
ImageImageImageImage
User avatar
WigNosy
Posts: 6908
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2014 6:39 pm
PBSL Team: Portland Trailblazers

Re: Revising Athletics Ratings

Post by WigNosy »

IamQuailman wrote: Tue Jan 09, 2018 4:52 pm Can we bump this?
I think you just did. But it's not really polished enough in its current form to bring up for a vote.

Also, my latest batch of suggestions have been mostly about streamlining and simplifying.

Also also, I want to run some test sims where I only vary stamina and see what happens. Still not 100% sure how important stamina is (will report on this later).
The Cat is Back
Post Reply

Return to “Suggestion Box”