This makes sense to me. Really good process, actually. Good jerb, Doug.IamQuailman wrote:What about putting the onus on your opponent to send his DC to you, instead of waiting on an inputter? I haven't made videos in a long while, and I'll be honest, when they did it was a huge pain in the ass to do.
Or better yet, after the deadline, playoff GMs have the obligation to post their own DC in that sims dc thread for everyone to see. Not a hard task to ask. Makes everyone much more reliant on themselves. If someone fails to do so by 8am following morning, the onus then falls to the inputters, and then if none by noon, delayed to 8pm. If no dcs by 3pm, delayed til 5pm next day.
Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk
I'm backing Messina up here even though I don't think he was accusing anyone of cheating. They weren't sent out and this was after a few of us mentioned they hadn't been sent out.DarthVegito wrote:There's no correct answer. We'll always have people who enjoy throwing around accusations of mass conspiracy. No matter how much time we take from our lives and put into this league, no matter how much we move things around in our real life because we know it's playoff SIM day, no matter what we do you'll get shit like "but hey SIM league" implying and inferring the usual conspiracy that the puppet master(s) are cheating again. I've grown weary of it.
So here's how I see it. If you didn't get your opponents dc, that means no one got their opponents dc. And none of us are going to study your dc or even look at it before ours is inputted. I personally input my dc immediately after the SIM and if I need to look at my opponents adjustments for any reason the first thing I do is send that person my dc first and foremost so that that base is covered.
So once again...if anyone thinks that there is deceit and that we are studying your dcs when you are not able to. Well there's the door, don't let it hit you in the ass. That's all I have to say about this. Sure it may not be helpful but I dgaf. All these processes will always have faults because we all have real responsibilities irl and it gets difficult to keep up with. Even with four of us, all of our lives have been extremely busy lately and simply getting these dcs inputted and simmed has been rough. So yeah, bottom line we do the best we can but at no point is there any advantages we hold. And if you don't believe that then peace the Frye out.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
I got implied cheating. Maybe you didn't. Maybe you wouldn't. But I did. And when you're dealing with ones who seem quick to make accusations of foul play and cheating, well your benefit of the doubt gets pretty slim. And I'm 90% sure it was implied here as well.TrayWithAnA wrote:The Messinas are some of my oldest friends. I'd appreciate it if even when they are vocal, we treat them with at least the respect we would expect from everyone else.
This was a legitimate complaint and Wig and Doug addressed it. There was no need to call anyone out and show them the door.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Actually, I didn't think it was directed at me in any way. Looks like someone should take their assumed viewpoint of me as a person and turn it sideways, shine it up real nice..And you know the rest.TrayWithAnA wrote:You don't let anything roll of your back chad, so it's not a surprise you would not only have interpreted this as cheating but furthermore decide the complaint was directly aimed at you.
I like the onus that the OP took on this. Try and fix a problem for all. And I like that Doug and Wig apologized even though again shit happens. I don't care for you trying to run off a guy who participates because he had a legitimate gripe here. Nevermind that he again is one of my oldest friends.
This thread didn't need to get here but you brought it here, so just don't be surprised when others stick up for the guy you are indirectly after.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Was the idea of you messaging your opponent shot down? What if once a team indicates there DC is in, they then message their opponent with the DC? Forward or copy and paste, should be easy enough. We'd have to live off of an honor code, but I don't think your opponent would willfully deceive you at that point. I'm not sure.TheSyndicate wrote:So...
I don't know that we made any progress on how to improve this process. I feel like Wig's response left something lacking for me, like 'I'll try my best, but no promises, and if I don't get it done, sorry.'
Sure, you can divine a change in lineup or minutes, but what about changing a key player, defensive focus, or offensive focus? These are some key areas I look at when gameplanning against a team, and they are pieces we can't see unless we're shown. I'm not asking for a video, as I've heard those are a PITA to put together, but I think there should be an easy process to get this done consistently, and I'd appreciate the great minds of the league put our heads together to figure it out. It's the playoffs, you know?
Brilliant idea, Ben! Makes a lot more sense and pulls the responsibility from the DC entry team who honestly have way more important time-intensive tasks during the playoffs.DarthVegito wrote:I like Ben idea of making another league responsibility and pay someone to do it. Then we know it'll be done. It's hard for us to do it consistently depending on life and I think it may even be worse off if we're relying on our opponent to send it. It's often that some miss submitting a dc completely. Definitely couldn't rely on receiving a dc from them and I really hate us having to wait for this reason. So I'd vote for the new job.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Sold. thanks doug!IamQuailman wrote:Bump, did we ever establish this role? If not, I Don't think we should vote. Just make it happen. In fact, I volunteer as tribute. I think I can make this happen.
You should be the secondary. You hand west, i handle east. Points for all.TheSyndicate wrote:Sold. thanks doug!IamQuailman wrote:Bump, did we ever establish this role? If not, I Don't think we should vote. Just make it happen. In fact, I volunteer as tribute. I think I can make this happen.
Forgot to actively respond, but yes - I got da west.IamQuailman wrote:You should be the secondary. You hand west, i handle east. Points for all.TheSyndicate wrote:Sold. thanks doug!IamQuailman wrote:Bump, did we ever establish this role? If not, I Don't think we should vote. Just make it happen. In fact, I volunteer as tribute. I think I can make this happen.
Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk