I think we have the right pieces in place, but we need to give them time to develop. When Al Jefferson and Monta Ellis get to their potential, we will have a very potent offense around the superstar that is Lebron. I give it two more years. We know that we need a team around Lebron when he hits RFA to make him want to come back for another few years.WigNosy wrote:Right now your expectations are to be a middle of the pack playoff team. How long do you feel it will take to assemble a true contender around LeBron?
Miami has never been a place to spend extra money on trainings. We won't do it for this time period, but we may address it on all star weekend.IamQuailman wrote:Lebron looks like he truly is coming into his own. Do you have any plans on focusing specific trainings on any part of his game to help it grow?
He walked in the door with a starting spot on this team. The moment we acquired pack and spree, we decided to bring him along a little more slowly than originally anticipated. We are going to treat him like we did Jefferson. Sparingly in the first year. Primary backup in second. And anticipated starter in the third year.JNR wrote:GWR: Talk about Monta for a minute. He's only 20 but he seems well on his way to being a good player in this league. Are you planning on bringing him along slowly?
Lebron is definitely the star of this team and will be highlighted any way he can. But due to our roster, he will be playing sf this season.ballsohard wrote:Random Reporter: Have you given any thought to letting LeBron James play the 1 and emulate Penny Hardaway and Jalen Rose's past success? He certainly seems to be athletic enough.
Here is your response:LeBron's rookie contract puts you on the clock. How long before the lack of a title justifies a change at helm?
Here are are in that third year, two years after the original question, and you are saying:In his third year, we should have gotten enough talent around him to compete for a title.
An uncharitable reading of this says that the last time you said you'd be a contended in two years, you found yourself in a position to say that you would again need two years to be a contender. In two seasons, of course, LeBron will commanding a big salary, which makes the situation even worse.I think we have the right pieces in place, but we need to give them time to develop. When Al Jefferson and Monta Ellis get to their potential, we will have a very potent offense around the superstar that is Lebron. I give it two more years. We know that we need a team around Lebron when he hits RFA to make him want to come back for another few years.
Thank you for that rather impressive and detailed observation. Next question.42PhD wrote:Dr. Rocker of the Cleveland Rocker: Let me remind you of your press conference two seasons ago.
I asked you:
Here is your response:LeBron's rookie contract puts you on the clock. How long before the lack of a title justifies a change at helm?
Here are are in that third year, two years after the original question, and you are saying:In his third year, we should have gotten enough talent around him to compete for a title.
An uncharitable reading of this says that the last time you said you'd be a contended in two years, you found yourself in a position to say that you would again need two years to be a contender. In two seasons, of course, LeBron will commanding a big salary, which makes the situation even worse.I think we have the right pieces in place, but we need to give them time to develop. When Al Jefferson and Monta Ellis get to their potential, we will have a very potent offense around the superstar that is Lebron. I give it two more years. We know that we need a team around Lebron when he hits RFA to make him want to come back for another few years.
What would you care to set those who could read those comments that way?
I don't see the question here. Next?NOLa. wrote:
Sent via Morse code