Dirk is really happy to have a young guy like DerMarr that is going to be his wing man for years to come. Those two may not be a killer one two punch this year but the next couple of years they could be one of the best duos in the league. He is also happy that we brought back his buddy Steve Nash. Those two have been friends for a while and Steve and him really played well together at the end of last year. Tony Battie has been helping him develop as a rebounder. I think he really feels that we are building around him and his skill set now.JNR wrote:GWR: how did Dirk feel about the moves you made this offseason?
If the purpose of the tax is to keep competition equal by discouraging them from jacking up their cap, then no. I had thought I was going to make the playoffs then I probably would have kept the big contracts and shelled out. However, I saw that the Grizzlies had played a ton of road games and I had played a ton of home games and Cuttino was out for two months so the tax worked in discouraging me from paying 40+ points to be the worst lottery pick two years in a row.42PhD wrote:Dr. Rocker, The Cleveland Rocker: So, does the tax work?
Honestly, I love our core. . . BUT. . . We fully recognize that we are paying those three guys too much as a whole, especially Kandi (considering his role on the team), so our guards are going to be weak. We're excited to see what these guys can do. It is nice to be in a position where are players are on the up swings of their careers and hopefully we can put in place the pieces around them to make this work.Inner_GI wrote:Lakers HollyWood Reporter: Now that you are back in the tax, do you think a Dirk, Olowokandi, and Demarr is a solid foundation to contend?
I wouldn't call that situation stressful. We knew that by offering the big bucks we were going to get someone to accept and we knew that the GM of that player was going to be hacked off that we were stealing away a player they were planning on building around. We also knew that were not going to offer a sign and trade for any of them other than S-Jax. So it was more fun than stressful. The West is a crazy place so I see us the same place we've been the past two years, right on the cusp of the playoffs.NickMalone77 wrote:Nick Melon; You were pretty open about your negotiations with Wig. Have you ever gone through a more stressful situation than what was presented when DeMarr accepted to come to Portland and do you see yourself as a playoff team after the offseason?
Sounds like it works. I see the tax as a kind of tax on accumulated League wealth. If you are stockpiling overpaid or poorly fitting pieces, then the reward is not worth the cost. In that sense, it makes owners, at least those who are capable, try to be more efficient. I'd say in your case, that worked.kucoach7 wrote:If the purpose of the tax is to keep competition equal by discouraging them from jacking up their cap, then no. I had thought I was going to make the playoffs then I probably would have kept the big contracts and shelled out. However, I saw that the Grizzlies had played a ton of road games and I had played a ton of home games and Cuttino was out for two months so the tax worked in discouraging me from paying 40+ points to be the worst lottery pick two years in a row.42PhD wrote:Dr. Rocker, The Cleveland Rocker: So, does the tax work?
We didn't have any remorse before TC because we knew that we were going to overpay to bring in a young wing. That was always part of the plan. However, we would have had buyer's remorse if DerMarr would have had a bad TC. We're very happy that DerMarr is looking like he will become the player we thought he could become and hope that he continues to be #TCblessed (hashtag courtesy of Doug).NOLa. wrote:Did you have any buyers remorse towards Demarr before TC?
If you did, how do you feel now with Demarr looking really good?
That is actually real footage captured by TMZ at our team Halloween party.Xist2Inspire wrote:Does this accurately describe your reaction to Dirk reestablishing himself as a franchise player and winning MIP?
That is a great way of thinking of it. I have usually only thought of it as a penalty for teams that pay to play well but it can also work as guiding hand for teams that are hoarding talent that isn't producing. It worked for me but, then again, I always struggle with being points poor because I don't make the playoffs very often.42PhD wrote:Sounds like it works. I see the tax as a kind of tax on accumulated League wealth. If you are stockpiling overpaid or poorly fitting pieces, then the reward is not worth the cost. In that sense, it makes owners, at least those who are capable, try to be more efficient. I'd say in your case, that worked.kucoach7 wrote:If the purpose of the tax is to keep competition equal by discouraging them from jacking up their cap, then no. I had thought I was going to make the playoffs then I probably would have kept the big contracts and shelled out. However, I saw that the Grizzlies had played a ton of road games and I had played a ton of home games and Cuttino was out for two months so the tax worked in discouraging me from paying 40+ points to be the worst lottery pick two years in a row.42PhD wrote:Dr. Rocker, The Cleveland Rocker: So, does the tax work?
Framed in that way, would you care to add to your answer?
Also, Powell's Books forever.
kucoach7 wrote:That is actually real footage captured by TMZ at our team Halloween party.Xist2Inspire wrote:Does this accurately describe your reaction to Dirk reestablishing himself as a franchise player and winning MIP?
1. They're probably right.ballsohard wrote:Many fans in Portland say the only conference you can win is the press conference, what would be your response to the anxious fans ?