I'm not sure, I just wanted to bring up that 1) there should be a HOF and 2) who should get a vote?JNR wrote:We've been working on it. I'm in charge of the committee. We're hashing out details and voting stuff. Do you think we should vote on the way voting/nominating is done?
Sounds like a HOF Shadow Council to meJNR wrote:Here was the original idea. There would be a committee made up of 4 people. The committee would discuss each season which retired players (no 5 year limit here) we feel is worthy of the Hall of Fame. From there, we would give a "class" of nominees.
Once the class was announced (presumably over the All Star break), the GMs would vote on whether they felt the nominee deserved to be in the Hall of Fame. To make the Hall of Fame, the candidate would need 70% yes votes.
If new GMs voting is something you're concerned about, we can ask new GMs who weren't around to abstain from voting. Since it's a percentage, it shouldn't affect the voting too much.
But better because I'm a part of it.IamQuailman wrote:Sounds like a HOF Shadow Council to meJNR wrote:Here was the original idea. There would be a committee made up of 4 people. The committee would discuss each season which retired players (no 5 year limit here) we feel is worthy of the Hall of Fame. From there, we would give a "class" of nominees.
Once the class was announced (presumably over the All Star break), the GMs would vote on whether they felt the nominee deserved to be in the Hall of Fame. To make the Hall of Fame, the candidate would need 70% yes votes.
If new GMs voting is something you're concerned about, we can ask new GMs who weren't around to abstain from voting. Since it's a percentage, it shouldn't affect the voting too much.