IamQuailman wrote:ALSO: The RFA trading moratorium goes into effect at 5 pm (when the second round of the draft is processed tomorrow). At 5 pm, your cap space/holds will be locked in (except for cap space freed by cuts of 2nd-round picks, you can do your own math on those) and the list of RFAs and teams limited to making less than a max offer on RFA players will be processed and posted.
"Please take my old crap. To entice you, here's some newer, younger crap"IamQuailman wrote:Willing to package Brendan Haywood (young, athletic 7' C with good offensive rebounding and defensive stats on 2nd year of rookie deal) with Bryant Stith to move before deadline.
"For those of you who will not engage unless the salary dump is massive, mucusy, and centered over your face, here is the 'roided up dump . . . ."LoCo89 wrote:"Please take my old crap. To entice you, here's some newer, younger crap"IamQuailman wrote:Willing to package Brendan Haywood (young, athletic 7' C with good offensive rebounding and defensive stats on 2nd year of rookie deal) with Bryant Stith to move before deadline.
Sent via carrier pigeon named Robbie
Gross42PhD wrote:"For those of you who will not engage unless the salary dump is massive, mucusy, and centered over your face, here is the 'roided up dump . . . ."LoCo89 wrote:"Please take my old crap. To entice you, here's some newer, younger crap"IamQuailman wrote:Willing to package Brendan Haywood (young, athletic 7' C with good offensive rebounding and defensive stats on 2nd year of rookie deal) with Bryant Stith to move before deadline.
Sent via carrier pigeon named Robbie
Would you like to discuss something more in private then?kucoach7 wrote:I'm very happy with Mobley's deal and will accept but I'm still looking to sign and trade him if I can either get an older better player or a younger developing player with potential. HMU
kucoach7 wrote:I'm very happy with Mobley's deal and will accept but I'm still looking to sign and trade him if I can either get an older better player or a younger developing player with potential. HMU
Oh yeah, I can only trade with you. I always forget the RFA rules.NickMalone77 wrote:Would you like to discuss something more in private then?kucoach7 wrote:I'm very happy with Mobley's deal and will accept but I'm still looking to sign and trade him if I can either get an older better player or a younger developing player with potential. HMU
Same amount for pierce just an extra year?PaulyP wrote:I offered Brian Skinner more money and an extra year and I offered Pierce an extra year but both signed with the Hornets. WIGGING traitors
Yeah, offered the 5 year supermaxDarthVegito wrote:Same amount for pierce just an extra year?PaulyP wrote:I offered Brian Skinner more money and an extra year and I offered Pierce an extra year but both signed with the Hornets. WIGGING traitors
Wow. Very very interesting indeed. Damn that's crazy. Doesn't make sense. Not like Hornets have anything to offer. These SIM players do weird shit some times.PaulyP wrote:Yeah, offered the 5 year supermaxDarthVegito wrote:Same amount for pierce just an extra year?PaulyP wrote:I offered Brian Skinner more money and an extra year and I offered Pierce an extra year but both signed with the Hornets. WIGGING traitors
I think its funny that they decided to sign with a team that is renowned for having zero loyalty towards their players. No offense Nick. (Maybe a little, just to stir the pot)LoCo89 wrote:The reeeaaaalllyy weird part is that it was both deciding not to go back to the same placeBC then the question is, is it more on the players or some stigma on the team?
PaulyP wrote:I think its funny that they decided to sign with a team that is renowned for having zero loyalty towards their players. No offense Nick. (Maybe a little, just to stir the pot)LoCo89 wrote:The reeeaaaalllyy weird part is that it was both deciding not to go back to the same placeBC then the question is, is it more on the players or some stigma on the team?
Shots or not...It's truth. I would just like a little sim league player logic. Tell us why Paul. Mo Pete Frye your wife? It would at least explain this.PaulyP wrote:I think its funny that they decided to sign with a team that is renowned for having zero loyalty towards their players. No offense Nick. (Maybe a little, just to stir the pot)LoCo89 wrote:The reeeaaaalllyy weird part is that it was both deciding not to go back to the same placeBC then the question is, is it more on the players or some stigma on the team?