There is no debt of gratitude owed since we had offers for Chris Webber last season and Eddie House this offseason.42PhD wrote:Dr. Rocker, The Cleveland Rocker: Prior to last offseason, you famously said:
"The tax won't hurt me because I can only sign minimum players anyway so the tax doesn't mean crap to me."
Now, you fully admit to trading away talent to shave a tax bill and needing to be more fiscally responsible. You did this prior to the tax bills being locked in, clearly and prior to Orlando becoming the face of tax problems in the League, sparing you and the Mavericks on the growing list of tax casualties.
You currently also are in the tax, but can easily avoid it by trimming some minimum contract players you touted in your opener. You can also try to sell cap space for points and participate in League activities to gain points, something you have not done regularly.
Are you in fact more fiscally responsible? How? Is that what made you trim your tax bill, or do you owe a debt of gratitude to other GM's for helping you to act to lessen the tax blow by showing you the light?
Yeah, that's not what you said. Being fiscally responsible long-term does not mean you will start off by being a flagrant spender. It may take time to "get there," but you do actually start.78# wrote:There is no debt of gratitude owed since we had offers for Chris Webber last season and Eddie House this offseason.42PhD wrote:Dr. Rocker, The Cleveland Rocker: Prior to last offseason, you famously said:
"The tax won't hurt me because I can only sign minimum players anyway so the tax doesn't mean crap to me."
Now, you fully admit to trading away talent to shave a tax bill and needing to be more fiscally responsible. You did this prior to the tax bills being locked in, clearly and prior to Orlando becoming the face of tax problems in the League, sparing you and the Mavericks on the growing list of tax casualties.
You currently also are in the tax, but can easily avoid it by trimming some minimum contract players you touted in your opener. You can also try to sell cap space for points and participate in League activities to gain points, something you have not done regularly.
Are you in fact more fiscally responsible? How? Is that what made you trim your tax bill, or do you owe a debt of gratitude to other GM's for helping you to act to lessen the tax blow by showing you the light?
And the plan is to be more fiscally responsible long-term which doesn't happen right away. I know its hard for you to process that due to your ASSperger's, but if you read my last paragraph slowly, it clearly states the plan is to be fiscally responsible long-term, not this season. Now go Frye yourself.
I obviously took an offer for House since he got traded. Guess you missed that too.42PhD wrote:Yeah, that's not what you said. Being fiscally responsible long-term does not mean you will start off by being a flagrant spender. It may take time to "get there," but you do actually start.78# wrote:There is no debt of gratitude owed since we had offers for Chris Webber last season and Eddie House this offseason.42PhD wrote:Dr. Rocker, The Cleveland Rocker: Prior to last offseason, you famously said:
"The tax won't hurt me because I can only sign minimum players anyway so the tax doesn't mean crap to me."
Now, you fully admit to trading away talent to shave a tax bill and needing to be more fiscally responsible. You did this prior to the tax bills being locked in, clearly and prior to Orlando becoming the face of tax problems in the League, sparing you and the Mavericks on the growing list of tax casualties.
You currently also are in the tax, but can easily avoid it by trimming some minimum contract players you touted in your opener. You can also try to sell cap space for points and participate in League activities to gain points, something you have not done regularly.
Are you in fact more fiscally responsible? How? Is that what made you trim your tax bill, or do you owe a debt of gratitude to other GM's for helping you to act to lessen the tax blow by showing you the light?
And the plan is to be more fiscally responsible long-term which doesn't happen right away. I know its hard for you to process that due to your ASSperger's, but if you read my last paragraph slowly, it clearly states the plan is to be fiscally responsible long-term, not this season. Now go Frye yourself.
Sounds like the tax did hurt you, is hurting you, will hurt you, and means crap to you.
Your hostilities are unwarranted, as you just said, you had offers and you didn't take the one for House. You did this to yourself and looks like you'll continue to do it.
I suppose if you really mean that, you'll be adding salary via trade this season by packaging mins and paying the tax again. I look forward to see if this is just machismo and bluster to try to "win" a press conference.
See, I can do that without insulting you.
You're welcome.
You traded Kemp last season, as you noted, to avoid tax. You traded House this season... After you paid the tax on him last season, which was the point.78# wrote:I obviously took an offer for House since he got traded. Guess you missed that too.42PhD wrote:Yeah, that's not what you said. Being fiscally responsible long-term does not mean you will start off by being a flagrant spender. It may take time to "get there," but you do actually start.78# wrote: There is no debt of gratitude owed since we had offers for Chris Webber last season and Eddie House this offseason.
And the plan is to be more fiscally responsible long-term which doesn't happen right away. I know its hard for you to process that due to your ASSperger's, but if you read my last paragraph slowly, it clearly states the plan is to be fiscally responsible long-term, not this season. Now go Frye yourself.
Sounds like the tax did hurt you, is hurting you, will hurt you, and means crap to you.
Your hostilities are unwarranted, as you just said, you had offers and you didn't take the one for House. You did this to yourself and looks like you'll continue to do it.
I suppose if you really mean that, you'll be adding salary via trade this season by packaging mins and paying the tax again. I look forward to see if this is just machismo and bluster to try to "win" a press conference.
See, I can do that without insulting you.
You're welcome.
Insulting you is funner so I'll keep doing it throughout the year. Just make sure your team doesn't fall flat on its face cause I will be the first to let you know about. At least win a playoff game this season.
He had a good training camp and followed that up with a really good preseason. He's starting for a now, but he's probably gonna be available for a trade by the deadline.Xist2Inspire wrote:Random Reporter: It looks like despite being the subject of trade rumors late in the offseason, Peja is now a vital piece to maintaining your success. What are you hoping to get from him this season, are you confident that he can fill the secondary scoring void?
We've never discussed moving Kidd. There's a strong chance he will be here next season. We're not likely to bid on free agents due to the tax. We're always taking offers.Conroy wrote:Bill Simmons Sports Guy Here, Jason Kidd was always a popular name here in Boston. Nothing ever materialized though, what's the plan moving forward with him? Is there a market for him? Is there any chance in hell he's in a Rockets uniform next year?
It's gonna be a tough season. We're looking like an average team right now. Our main guys took a hit in TC and we have a lot of new parts to work in.RPF wrote:New Jersey Reporter: What are your expectations this season in the tough midwest?