Page 3 of 3

Re: 2002 Draft Selection Discussion Thread

Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2015 8:29 pm
by Xist2Inspire
NOLa. wrote:Et tu, x1st? loco shouted obscenities as soon as I made that pick
Yeah, I was gonna use him as a combo guard and hope his size and skill offset his lack of speed. He, AJ, and Lamar would've made a nice ball-moving trio.

Re: 2002 Draft Selection Discussion Thread

Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2015 8:29 pm
by Bowtothebill23
IamQuailman wrote:I just hope bowtothebill drafts Nikoloz Tskitishvili
Shhh man that's my second round sleeper.

Re: 2002 Draft Selection Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2015 4:03 am
by PaulyP
At #3 I knew I was gonna go big, it was either Boozer or Okur. Went with Okur due to his versatility and the fact that most of his other important attributes were already decent enough. If I didnt have the intention of maxing Pierce I probably go Caron at #3

Re: 2002 Draft Selection Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2015 7:43 am
by JNR
PaulyP wrote:At #3 I knew I was gonna go big, it was either Boozer or Okur. Went with Okur due to his versatility and the fact that most of his other important attributes were already decent enough. If I didnt have the intention of maxing Pierce I probably go Caron at #3
I loved the pick. I'm really high on Okur. Think with some training he can be a legitimate star.

Re: 2002 Draft Selection Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2015 7:49 am
by NOLa.
Was it a "compete now" move to draft Okur since you will need to pay Pierce? I really loved the idea of Pierce and Boozer together, but Boozer will need a few seasons to grow

Sent from my SM-S765C using Tapatalk

Re: 2002 Draft Selection Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2015 8:44 am
by IamQuailman
JNR wrote:
PaulyP wrote:At #3 I knew I was gonna go big, it was either Boozer or Okur. Went with Okur due to his versatility and the fact that most of his other important attributes were already decent enough. If I didnt have the intention of maxing Pierce I probably go Caron at #3
I loved the pick. I'm really high on Okur. Think with some training he can be a legitimate star.
Do you mean the "training" he received in the PR league? Because AD23forMVP isn't walking through that door.

Re: 2002 Draft Selection Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2015 2:43 pm
by PaulyP
NOLa. wrote:Was it a "compete now" move to draft Okur since you will need to pay Pierce? I really loved the idea of Pierce and Boozer together, but Boozer will need a few seasons to grow

Sent from my SM-S765C using Tapatalk
I agree with JNR that Okur with some training and luck in TC could easily be an All-Star whereas Boozer is probably 3 seasons away from being really productive. Definitely a compete now move on my part to pick Okur

Re: 2002 Draft Selection Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2015 3:00 pm
by Conroy
PaulyP wrote:
NOLa. wrote:Was it a "compete now" move to draft Okur since you will need to pay Pierce? I really loved the idea of Pierce and Boozer together, but Boozer will need a few seasons to grow

Sent from my SM-S765C using Tapatalk
I agree with JNR that Okur with some training and luck in TC could easily be an All-Star whereas Boozer is probably 3 seasons away from being really productive. Definitely a compete now move on my part to pick Okur
Worked out great for the both of us, I was hoping Boozer would fall. I just was certain I was taking who was left b/w Boozer and Prince. Looks like I was way off with Butler even being drafted before Prince.

It did set in motion my youth movement. I could trot out a starting 5 that can't even legally drink.

Re: 2002 Draft Selection Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2015 3:32 pm
by kucoach7
Conroy wrote:
PaulyP wrote:
NOLa. wrote:Was it a "compete now" move to draft Okur since you will need to pay Pierce? I really loved the idea of Pierce and Boozer together, but Boozer will need a few seasons to grow

Sent from my SM-S765C using Tapatalk
I agree with JNR that Okur with some training and luck in TC could easily be an All-Star whereas Boozer is probably 3 seasons away from being really productive. Definitely a compete now move on my part to pick Okur
Worked out great for the both of us, I was hoping Boozer would fall. I just was certain I was taking who was left b/w Boozer and Prince. Looks like I was way off with Butler even being drafted before Prince.

It did set in motion my youth movement. I could trot out a starting 5 that can't even legally drink.
I think you got a steal with Jay Williams. I could see him jumping to g/g easy.

Re: 2002 Draft Selection Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2015 3:45 pm
by RPF
I agree about Jay Williams unfortunately

Re: 2002 Draft Selection Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2015 3:45 pm
by IamQuailman
I think this thread was a great success. I'm surprised in all the years we've had drafts that we never made one of these discussion threads for the draft as it goes.

Re: 2002 Draft Selection Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2015 4:00 pm
by PaulyP
Curtis Borchardt still available in the 2nd Round for those that want to recreate Ad23's sim league dynasty lmao

Re: 2002 Draft Selection Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2015 4:07 pm
by 42PhD
PaulyP wrote:Curtis Borchardt still available in the 2nd Round for those that want to recreate Ad23's sim league dynasty lmao
The last 5 lines of my 2nd round submission (for the second 2nd rounder) to Quail:

Maceo Baston
Lonny Baxter
Nikoloz Tskitishvili
Efthimios Rentzias
Curtis Borchardt (just to WIG with you)

Re: 2002 Draft Selection Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2015 4:15 pm
by PaulyP
42PhD wrote:
PaulyP wrote:Curtis Borchardt still available in the 2nd Round for those that want to recreate Ad23's sim league dynasty lmao
Efthimios Rentzias
Best name in sports history

Re: 2002 Draft Selection Discussion Thread

Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2015 4:24 pm
by 42PhD
PaulyP wrote:
42PhD wrote:
PaulyP wrote:Curtis Borchardt still available in the 2nd Round for those that want to recreate Ad23's sim league dynasty lmao
Efthimios Rentzias
Best name in sports history
And some people think second round picks have no utility...