Some of us struggle to complete our insanely talented rosters and some of us don't.DarthVegito wrote:Most entertaining thread today.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
I know :/ We need to ask Tani how he does it!?TrayWithAnA wrote:Some of us struggle to complete our insanely talented rosters and some of us don't.DarthVegito wrote:Most entertaining thread today.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
anyone else have to google pedantic?WigNosy wrote:No worries. This one of those times I have to play pedantic ogre and enforce the rules. :pTrayWithAnA wrote:Didn't realize 78 was over the salary cap. I'll figure out a way before tomorrow.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
+1 (bet you thought I was gonna take a shot at you)Conroy wrote:anyone else have to google pedantic?WigNosy wrote:No worries. This one of those times I have to play pedantic ogre and enforce the rules. :pTrayWithAnA wrote:Didn't realize 78 was over the salary cap. I'll figure out a way before tomorrow.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Processed.TrayWithAnA wrote:I don't mean to drag this thread out any longer, but as I see it -
Iverson was traded
Walker was cut
The salary I am sending is higher that what he is sending.
The original trade should process fine now with no other adjustments to this thread.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thanks again Wig. Sorry for being a pain.WigNosy wrote:Processed.TrayWithAnA wrote:I don't mean to drag this thread out any longer, but as I see it -
Iverson was traded
Walker was cut
The salary I am sending is higher that what he is sending.
The original trade should process fine now with no other adjustments to this thread.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
(Note: the reason it didn't work prior to the Walker cut is that the Iverson trade left the Rockets under the cap, but only by $22,000 or so - not enough to absorb the difference in salary sand stay under the cap, which is why salaries had to match. With Walker off the books, they were about $1.5 million under the cap, allowing them to absorb the excess $600K in salary and still be under the cap).
Record breaking performance, 78. Grats!78# wrote:Wow, 34 replies on a thread involving 4 points and minimum players.
See!!! It's not just me that fails at #SimpleMathNOLa. wrote:Dammit Nick why can't you figure out the trade checker.
.....wait
Sent via Morse code
One of the few record breaking performance I've had outside of the luxury tax bills I've had to pay.TrayWithAnA wrote:Record breaking performance, 78. Grats!78# wrote:Wow, 34 replies on a thread involving 4 points and minimum players.