Absolutely not. Purple is supposed to be the "best of the best". MJ or Hakeem in real life, in their prime had no equal. There shouldnt be more than a small percentage of these guys in the league period, let alone at the same timeSoundwave wrote: And shouldn't all players have a chance however unlikely it is to become "Purple"?
Yeah, I think I can roll with that.ballsohard wrote:Wave, would you be on board with something like .. If they had purple potential all you can do is train their current ? That seems to account for some of the issues here.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Good point, and no... thats not part of the deal... :dNOLa. wrote:As long as I can train in gym rat....
I mean, yeah thats cool
I have a b/p and suggested it and Tani agree'd and has a B/P as wellConroy wrote:I've been thinking of this for a while. And for the longest time thought this was the actual rule. When doing the trade value I looked at all of the purples, there were 5 or 6 with purple potential when we started this league, and only 1 with current (I believe) who was MJ. Now I think there are currently 16 with purple potential with 9 guys having it as current. There is already too much purple in the league IMO, so I agree these guys do not need outside help in getting any better. Let's let the game play out some.
This is going to be a tough one to argue, I think we should let some guys with zero purple players on their roster discuss it, a lot of people are going to come off sonding bias here, Sound for example has a blue purple player...he's obviously going to argue against this strongly. Much like I argued against the All-League restriction from training strongly b/c Zo was a blue/blue.
OK, let me rephrase..Sound is the only asshole in the converstaion then.ballsohard wrote:I have a b/p and suggested it and Tani agree'd and has a B/P as wellConroy wrote:I've been thinking of this for a while. And for the longest time thought this was the actual rule. When doing the trade value I looked at all of the purples, there were 5 or 6 with purple potential when we started this league, and only 1 with current (I believe) who was MJ. Now I think there are currently 16 with purple potential with 9 guys having it as current. There is already too much purple in the league IMO, so I agree these guys do not need outside help in getting any better. Let's let the game play out some.
This is going to be a tough one to argue, I think we should let some guys with zero purple players on their roster discuss it, a lot of people are going to come off sonding bias here, Sound for example has a blue purple player...he's obviously going to argue against this strongly. Much like I argued against the All-League restriction from training strongly b/c Zo was a blue/blue.
I've had this same stance for years. Argued with Chad and Scott about it many times. I assure you, my ability to train Chauncey 1 more time in passing has absolutely nothing to do with my opinion on this.Conroy wrote:OK, let me rephrase..Sound is the only asshole in the converstaion then.ballsohard wrote:I have a b/p and suggested it and Tani agree'd and has a B/P as wellConroy wrote:I've been thinking of this for a while. And for the longest time thought this was the actual rule. When doing the trade value I looked at all of the purples, there were 5 or 6 with purple potential when we started this league, and only 1 with current (I believe) who was MJ. Now I think there are currently 16 with purple potential with 9 guys having it as current. There is already too much purple in the league IMO, so I agree these guys do not need outside help in getting any better. Let's let the game play out some.
This is going to be a tough one to argue, I think we should let some guys with zero purple players on their roster discuss it, a lot of people are going to come off sonding bias here, Sound for example has a blue purple player...he's obviously going to argue against this strongly. Much like I argued against the All-League restriction from training strongly b/c Zo was a blue/blue.
Argued about what with me ?Soundwave wrote:I've had this same stance for years. Argued with Chad and Scott about it many times. I assure you, my ability to train Chauncey 1 more time in passing has absolutely nothing to do with my opinion on this.Conroy wrote:OK, let me rephrase..Sound is the only asshole in the converstaion then.ballsohard wrote: I have a b/p and suggested it and Tani agree'd and has a B/P as well