S42 - Prop 1A - Contraction Draft vs. Free Agency

All voting on new rules will take place here. No discussion; only voting!

Moderators: Soundwave, ballsohard, WigNosy, IamQuailman, NOLa.

Post Reply

If the league contracts, how should we handle the distribution of contracted players?

Poll ended at Sun Jan 05, 2020 11:40 am

Contraction Draft
6
60%
Free Agency
4
40%
 
Total votes: 10

User avatar
garbageman
Posts: 8289
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2016 11:19 am
PBSL Team: Chicago Bulls
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:

S42 - Prop 1A - Contraction Draft vs. Free Agency

Post by garbageman » Fri Jan 03, 2020 11:40 am

In anticipation of prop 1 passing (11-0 unanimous vote at the time), I'd like to get started with another poll.

Once the league is contracted, how do we divide up players and picks?

Our two main options:

1. Contraction Draft - All players with guaranteed contracts and any future picks traded to teams up for contraction by non-contracting teams (e.g. the Bobcats have the 2032 Wizards and Nuggets 1sts and the Trailblazers have the 2032 Pacers and 2034 Nuggets 1sts), and the option to pass will be eligible for a contraction draft that takes place between the seasons changing over.

I imagine that:

1. All non-guaranteed contracts (including expiring RFAs) would go directly to UFA.
2. All contracted draft picks would be dissolved.
3. All points banks would be closed. I don't see a compelling reason to distribute points since they're imaginary.

There are enough of these players and picks for more than 1 round, but not 2 full rounds. For simplicity's sake, I'd like to just go one round and void all contracts that don't get picked.

If this option is selected, we'd need to develop a mechanism to determine the draft order. Here are the options I'm considering right now (I'm open to more).

1. We go by record. This just doubles up the benefit of tanking for one year.
2. We go completely random.
3. We do a silent "bid" for draft order. How this would work is that GM1, GM2, and GM3 (and so on...) can bid any amount of points in their point bank for the best spot. These points get deducted from the point bank regardless of where they land in the draft order. Ties are decided by record.

We'd also need to decide whether a team that's over the cap can draft a contract...or if they need the cap space to take on a contract.

Finally, we'd need to decide how the playoffs and draft lottery would work with fewer teams. That will be discussed later.


2. Free Agency

All players' contracts are voided and they enter free agency. This is a less hairy option. We would need to decide what happens with the 4 picks (2032&2034 Nuggets, 2032 Pacers, 2032 Wizards). Perhaps the silent "bid" option would work here, too.
ImageImage

User avatar
false9
Posts: 4328
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2016 7:13 pm
PBSL Team: Parts unknown
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: S42 - Prop 1A - Contraction Draft vs. Free Agency

Post by false9 » Fri Jan 03, 2020 2:26 pm

Voted. I LOVE ME SOME DRAFT, BABY. I’d be fine if it was by record, and would be ok with a team over the cap taking on salary.
Image

Courtesy of the big homie RPF

User avatar
Keepit100
Posts: 770
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2019 5:43 pm
PBSL Team: 76ers

Re: S42 - Prop 1A - Contraction Draft vs. Free Agency

Post by Keepit100 » Fri Jan 03, 2020 2:30 pm

Cool with a contraction draft being randomized like how the creation one was done for the 1990 season
IamQuailman wrote:
Tue Jan 13, 2015 9:28 pm
1990 Creation Draft Selection Show!

Ok guys welcome to the 1990 NBA Creation Draft Selection Show!!! I will list the draft order starting with pick #29 until we eventually find out who gets the #1 pick! The show will start between 7:45-8:00PM CT.
phpBB [video]
Credit: DarthVegito video

User avatar
MexicanMamba
Posts: 4841
Joined: Tue Jun 25, 2019 3:31 pm
PBSL Team: Clippers

Re: S42 - Prop 1A - Contraction Draft vs. Free Agency

Post by MexicanMamba » Fri Jan 03, 2020 3:25 pm

Free Agency was my vote. Feels like the most clean and easy.

User avatar
greepleairport
Posts: 3806
Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2019 6:28 pm
PBSL Team: Golden State Warriors

Re: S42 - Prop 1A - Contraction Draft vs. Free Agency

Post by greepleairport » Fri Jan 03, 2020 3:44 pm

Voted
Somehow I manage.

User avatar
Wombataholic
Posts: 866
Joined: Sun May 14, 2017 12:59 pm
PBSL Team: Detroit Pistons

Re: S42 - Prop 1A - Contraction Draft vs. Free Agency

Post by Wombataholic » Fri Jan 03, 2020 4:49 pm

voted.
Image

TheSyndicate
Posts: 3716
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 2:15 pm
PBSL Team:

Re: S42 - Prop 1A - Contraction Draft vs. Free Agency

Post by TheSyndicate » Fri Jan 03, 2020 7:58 pm

Voted. Free agency makes the most sense to me. Otherwise a random draft order draft would be fine too, and yes to over cap teams drafting
6 Rings. That's it. That's the tweet.

User avatar
NOLa.
Posts: 3994
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2015 9:21 pm
PBSL Team: Sacramento Kings

Re: S42 - Prop 1A - Contraction Draft vs. Free Agency

Post by NOLa. » Sat Jan 04, 2020 9:17 am

Voted for draft and like the idea of random order, even though I'm one of the bottom active teams. First thought initially was that having it based on record order would balance the league out, but random would be fun and prevent tanking from having a double bonus of regular draft and contraction draft.

User avatar
drkavarga
Posts: 1959
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2018 10:33 pm
PBSL Team: Bobcats

Re: S42 - Prop 1A - Contraction Draft vs. Free Agency

Post by drkavarga » Sat Jan 04, 2020 3:30 pm

I like the draft idea better. To me it's more fair and should be based on team record from the season.
General Manager of the Charlotte Bobcats

User avatar
garbageman
Posts: 8289
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2016 11:19 am
PBSL Team: Chicago Bulls
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:

Re: S42 - Prop 1A - Contraction Draft vs. Free Agency

Post by garbageman » Sun Jan 05, 2020 8:26 pm

Contraction draft has won!
ImageImage

User avatar
AngryBanana
Posts: 4021
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2018 2:56 pm
PBSL Team: Boston Celtics

Re: S42 - Prop 1A - Contraction Draft vs. Free Agency

Post by AngryBanana » Mon Jan 06, 2020 12:39 pm

voted

Post Reply

Return to “#SLOE Polling Place”