2013-14 Proposition 4: (Training) Caps on Potential
Moderators: Soundwave, ballsohard, WigNosy, IamQuailman, NOLa.
2013-14 Proposition 4: (Training) Caps on Potential
This vote may modify the system presented Prop 3; if that fails, the results from this will be ignored.
As originally proposed, the new Training System would allow potential to be raised as high as 100 (if raised from a current potential of 80). Note also that current ratings may not be trained above 80. Note ALSO that there is no way to tell from the HTML output what a player's current potential score is exactly, only his letter grade.
This will be run in an "instant runoff" manner. Please vote for the LOWEST maximum potential you feel should be allowed. When tallying the votes, if the lowest option does not have at least half the votes, its total will be added to the next lowest option and the process will be repeated until at least half the votes are for capping at that number or below. (i.e., if 85 does not have 50% of the vote, its votes will be added to 90. If 90 then has 50% of the vote, the cap will be at 90. If 90 still doesn't have 50% of the vote, its votes will be added to 95. If 95 then has 50% of the vote, the cap will be 95. If 95 STILL doesn't have 50% of the vote, it means 100 won outright anyway).
As originally proposed, the new Training System would allow potential to be raised as high as 100 (if raised from a current potential of 80). Note also that current ratings may not be trained above 80. Note ALSO that there is no way to tell from the HTML output what a player's current potential score is exactly, only his letter grade.
This will be run in an "instant runoff" manner. Please vote for the LOWEST maximum potential you feel should be allowed. When tallying the votes, if the lowest option does not have at least half the votes, its total will be added to the next lowest option and the process will be repeated until at least half the votes are for capping at that number or below. (i.e., if 85 does not have 50% of the vote, its votes will be added to 90. If 90 then has 50% of the vote, the cap will be at 90. If 90 still doesn't have 50% of the vote, its votes will be added to 95. If 95 then has 50% of the vote, the cap will be 95. If 95 STILL doesn't have 50% of the vote, it means 100 won outright anyway).
- Xist2Inspire
- Posts: 3527
- Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 12:12 pm
- PBSL Team: DC Wizards
-
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2015 2:36 pm
- PBSL Team: New Orleans Pelicans
- Location: Greenlawn, NY
- IamQuailman
- Posts: 10247
- Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2015 8:25 am
- PBSL Team: Milwaukee Bucks
- Contact:
- ballsohard
- Posts: 3816
- Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2015 10:11 pm
- PBSL Team: Philidelphia 76ers
- garbageman
- Posts: 8406
- Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2016 11:19 am
- PBSL Team: Chicago Bulls
- Location: Chicago, IL
- Contact:
Re: 2013-14 Proposition 4: (Training) Caps on Potential
Voted
Pacers Ring of Honor
P.Ewing (90-93, 98) - R.Pierce (90-91) - S.Augmon (91-96) - D.Brown (93-96) - D.Strong (91-97, 99-02) - P.Pierce (98-05, 12-13) - D.Williams (05-17) - I.Shumpert (11-16) - D.Dedmon (13-18) - J.Williams (19-25, 31-32)
P.Ewing (90-93, 98) - R.Pierce (90-91) - S.Augmon (91-96) - D.Brown (93-96) - D.Strong (91-97, 99-02) - P.Pierce (98-05, 12-13) - D.Williams (05-17) - I.Shumpert (11-16) - D.Dedmon (13-18) - J.Williams (19-25, 31-32)
- Soundwave
- Posts: 1975
- Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2015 10:12 am
- PBSL Team: Toronto Raptors
- Location: Danger Zone
Re: 2013-14 Proposition 4: (Training) Caps on Potential
voted
I still got all my fingers but somewhere I lost my mind.