IamQuailman wrote:JNR wrote: ↑Tue Feb 14, 2017 3:15 pm
Something about those draft files bothers me a little, and it reminds me of IJBL, which is one of the reasons I was dead set against created players in the first place. Most of those guys are o/b or o/g, and I noticed that training camp completely wiped out a lot of those o/b guys in IJBL. Is it just something the import naturally does, creates guys coming in as oranges?
That's a good point, Raby. Having guys come in orange is a bit concerning.
If you look at the way the imports work, you will generally notice that high potential players tend to leave school early while lower potential players stay (just like real life).
This means the 18 and 19 year olds generally have more potential than the 22 year olds. However, the 22 year olds tend to be better now because they have had more time in college to polish their games (also like real life).
So you see a lot of 18 year old o/g or o/b guys, a few y/b and a couple 22 year old g/g or g/b guys. It actually feels more realistic to me. Don"t forget too that players get a TC between draft and rookie season so most young guys come in better than they look in the draf file.
Yes, it does mean a lot of waiting most of a rookie deal for your would-be superstar to blossom. But looking at the real NBA that seems to be normal. Besides, do we really want drafts where rookies are in the MVP discussion?
I am not as concerned that TC will slam the talent pool like it did the IJBL because we have TC insurance, which the IJBL did not. If not for TC insurance over the past few seasons, we would have a lot less talent in our league too (most teams have two or more players that would have lost talent in TC if not for insurance).